Education not an issue? - - 'Demopublicans' won't talk about it

AlexWalker's picture

Forget ideology. Forget the personalities of individual politicians. I think I could write a whole book arguing for the Green Party simply based on all the important issues that get short shrift simply because the damned Democrats and Republicans don't talk about them. And according to the two-party totalitarian culture of the United States, if "liberal" Democrats and "conservative" Republicans don't talk about a problem, then it's not a problem.

Jeffrey Henig has an interesting op-ed in the Boston Globe on why education is a missing issue in this year's political campaign. "Liberal" Democrats are now divided on the question of charter schools and "Conservative" Republicans are now divided on Bush's No Child Left Behind Act. And so, the gutless politician's are doing what gutless Demopublicans always do -- playing it safe.

Published by the Boston Globe, March 1, 2008
The Debate on Education
by Jeffrey R. Henig

IN THIS presidential primary season, the issue of education has been like Sherlock Holmes's dog that didn't bark. Education is so far off the radar screen that, in an Associated Press-Yahoo poll, it didn't even make the 18-item list when voters were asked, "How important is each of the following issues to you personally?"

. . .

When education does enter national political debates, it's highly polarized and not fruitful. Conservatives lambast teacher unions and public school bureaucracies for attending to their own needs instead of those of the children...

Liberals blame poor school performance on insufficient government funding...

. . .

But there's another reason why education has been shortchanged this election season. Both parties have recently become more internally divided about the key issues of charter schools and the No Child Left Behind Act.

Democrats, who used to argue against charter schools (casting them as vouchers in sheep's clothing), increasingly see charters as a benign and promising form of public school reform. Republicans, who once could rally around the get-tough aspects of No Child Left Behind, are growing irritated about the negative impact of high-stakes testing.

This internal ambivalence is making it risky for the candidates to use the tried-and-true formulations that have worked in the past. . .

This is an issue that is close to me. My wife, Cathy Deppe and my daughter have taught in the public schools in San Jose. Cathy has also taught in Los Angeles where the Los Angeles Unified School District, presided over by the Los Angeles Democratic Party Machine is an absolute disgrace. We have grandchildren attending public schools in California where our sacrosanct racist 2-Party System has all but destroyed what was once one of the finest systems of public education in the world.

On the war, foreign policy, health care, global warming, sustainable communities, immigration... and education... we need the Green Party.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Amogasiddhi's picture

If you go here you can see Obama's policies on education:

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/education/

I believe we can have a stronger voice, if we deal with facts.

I help start the Greens here in Minnesota about 18 years ago. I have lived in Japan for the last 8 years but have just come back to Keith Ellison's 5th district of Minneapolis, MN. I am also a Wellstone Democrat, whose primary issue was education. Both these democrats are Education oriented.

If we can ever get folks into the congress or senate, we will have to caucus with democrats like these. Bernie Sanders is a great example.

So PLEASE don't do like that idiot Nader and paint all non-Greens with the same brush. I think we need to organize as Greens and then caucus within the Democratic Party. Until we change the system, it is our most effect approach.

--
Lee (The Green Buddhist/Wellstone Democrat) in Mashiko, Japan
Mpls, Minnesota USA http://mashikopots.blogspot.com/
"The way we are, we are members of each other. All of us. Everything. The difference ain't in who is a member and who is not, but in who knows it & who don't

lounovak's picture

... is greatly diminished by referring to Nader as an idiot.

"Do not speak harshly to any one; those who are spoken to will answer thee in the same way. Angry speech is painful: blows for blows will touch thee."
- Buddha

User login

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Recent comments